Reflecting on old elections I have voted in got me thinking of a thought experiment I'd love folks on the right to participate in:
1. The last four presidents have included two Democrats and two Republicans. Do you believe, on the whole, that the presidencies of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama have been better or worse for our country than the combined presidency's of George W Bush and Donald Trump? Despite all the flaws of the Dems, and the personal, moral flaws of Clinton, to me it is a landslide victory for the Dems over the disastrous presidencies of the two Republicans. I really don't see the argument the other way, if everything is tallied up objectively.
2. Second question--do you believe that if the opposing candidate had won each of the elections since Clinton that the country would be better or worse off? That is, do you think we would have been better or worse off if HW Bush and Bob Doyle had been in charge over Clinton? Do you believe we would have been better or worse off under Gore vs W Bush? McCain and Romney vs Obama? HRC vs Trump? (From my perspective, I was voting against the Republican in these cases, except for the Obama elections--in both of those cases, I was voting for Obama, and the candidates he faced, by my estimation, happened to be the two best candidates Republicans had put up in my voting lifetime, but they just happened to face the best Democratic candidate in my lifetime, at least in terms of likability, coolness, and overall appeal to voters).
Team colors aside, that is enough elections to make a fair sample size for which side is better at running this nation of ours. Personally, I cannot fathom a full tally that would score the Republicans better than the Democrats over the last 28 years, at being president, at least.
1. The last four presidents have included two Democrats and two Republicans. Do you believe, on the whole, that the presidencies of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama have been better or worse for our country than the combined presidency's of George W Bush and Donald Trump? Despite all the flaws of the Dems, and the personal, moral flaws of Clinton, to me it is a landslide victory for the Dems over the disastrous presidencies of the two Republicans. I really don't see the argument the other way, if everything is tallied up objectively.
2. Second question--do you believe that if the opposing candidate had won each of the elections since Clinton that the country would be better or worse off? That is, do you think we would have been better or worse off if HW Bush and Bob Doyle had been in charge over Clinton? Do you believe we would have been better or worse off under Gore vs W Bush? McCain and Romney vs Obama? HRC vs Trump? (From my perspective, I was voting against the Republican in these cases, except for the Obama elections--in both of those cases, I was voting for Obama, and the candidates he faced, by my estimation, happened to be the two best candidates Republicans had put up in my voting lifetime, but they just happened to face the best Democratic candidate in my lifetime, at least in terms of likability, coolness, and overall appeal to voters).
Team colors aside, that is enough elections to make a fair sample size for which side is better at running this nation of ours. Personally, I cannot fathom a full tally that would score the Republicans better than the Democrats over the last 28 years, at being president, at least.
Comment