Originally posted by TopChuckie
View Post
But, back to the issue...read your post again, and read my answer(s). He had a right to plead the Fifth. It was the smart thing to do. It worked. Your question, though, was what more proof would I need to be convinced his version of events was true. That's what it would take for me, not as a Judge, but as a private individual (which I am now). If he had told that story in court and held up under cross, I don't think there would be nearly as much controversy. But his attorneys were right to keep him as far away from the stand as possible.
Comment