Nate Silver has an interesting way of framing the election today over at 538:
Obviously, people can be somewhat in both camps, but I'm curious how you view this election as compared to how you viewed the 2008 election.
In the referendum paradigm, the election comes down mostly to the performance of the incumbent, especially on economic matters. The identity of the opposition candidate matters relatively little: voters are choosing between “the incumbent” and “not the incumbent,” and if things get bad enough, almost anyone else will do.
In the choice paradigm, voters are more prospective than retrospective, making a decision on who will make the best president over the next four years. They may weigh the policy preferences of the candidates fairly heavily, along with their perceived ideological dispositions. And personality can play a role as well: the “who would you rather have a beer with” view of elections comes out of the choice school.
In the choice paradigm, voters are more prospective than retrospective, making a decision on who will make the best president over the next four years. They may weigh the policy preferences of the candidates fairly heavily, along with their perceived ideological dispositions. And personality can play a role as well: the “who would you rather have a beer with” view of elections comes out of the choice school.
Comment