Originally posted by nullnor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Unconditional love?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gregg View PostIt may be that we just have a misunderstanding of terms. What do you consider to be your definition of hate?
Seems to me that your emotional reaction to stealing from the poor would fall under my definition of hate for the purposes of discussing hating the sin. If asked I would say that ElD hates stealing from the poor. Does he hate those people that steal from the poor? By your posts I would say probably not.
Oh and thanks for your help with my trade.
Comment
-
Originally posted by eldiablo505"Hatred (or hate) is a deep and emotional extreme dislike. It can be directed against individuals, entities, objects, or ideas. Hatred is often associated with feelings of anger, disgust and a disposition towards hostility."
There just aren't that many things that can rile me up to this level. I kind of always operate on the surface, immediately venting all my frustrations. I don't tend to harbor "deep and emotional extreme" dislikes because it's just not worth my time. I guess I "hate" serial rape or serial murder, as those were the sins that you were responding to, but it just strikes me as weird.
This phrase is most often used by Christians, in my experience, to reference homosexuality. Oddly, it's almost never referred to things that actually appear in the bible, like divorce or adultery.
I don't believe in sin, don't believe anyone is a "sinner", and object in the most extreme to people who use this kind of phrase to backhandedly refer to homosexuals or homosexual acts. As someone else noted, this phrase is typically used as some special sort of condescending "love" that Christians feel the need to dole out to homosexuals (most often) or those they feel superior to. The phrase implies some kind of authority, a moral high ground occupied by those proud of themselves and casting condemnation on those whose actions or predispositions offend our stilted morality. It strikes me as the exact opposite kind of thing that Jesus would say. In fact, when faced with an adulterous woman, someone who was "such a woman" to those condemning her, whose humanity was taken from her by those casting aspersions, Jesus did just the opposite: he said, "neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more." His was not a message of hate and, frankly, that kind of odious talk has no place coming from a place of love and tolerance without judgment. You're a sinner. Stop pointing the finger at what others do and fix yourself.
I like this...oh very much so.Considering his only baseball post in the past year was bringing up a 3 year old thread to taunt Hornsby and he's never contributed a dime to our hatpass, perhaps?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by eldiablo505"Hatred (or hate) is a deep and emotional extreme dislike. It can be directed against individuals, entities, objects, or ideas. Hatred is often associated with feelings of anger, disgust and a disposition towards hostility."
There just aren't that many things that can rile me up to this level. I kind of always operate on the surface, immediately venting all my frustrations. I don't tend to harbor "deep and emotional extreme" dislikes because it's just not worth my time. I guess I "hate" serial rape or serial murder, as those were the sins that you were responding to, but it just strikes me as weird.
This phrase is most often used by Christians, in my experience, to reference homosexuality. Oddly, it's almost never referred to things that actually appear in the bible, like divorce or adultery.
I don't believe in sin, don't believe anyone is a "sinner", and object in the most extreme to people who use this kind of phrase to backhandedly refer to homosexuals or homosexual acts. As someone else noted, this phrase is typically used as some special sort of condescending "love" that Christians feel the need to dole out to homosexuals (most often) or those they feel superior to. The phrase implies some kind of authority, a moral high ground occupied by those proud of themselves and casting condemnation on those whose actions or predispositions offend our stilted morality. It strikes me as the exact opposite kind of thing that Jesus would say. In fact, when faced with an adulterous woman, someone who was "such a woman" to those condemning her, whose humanity was taken from her by those casting aspersions, Jesus did just the opposite: he said, "neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more." His was not a message of hate and, frankly, that kind of odious talk has no place coming from a place of love and tolerance without judgment. You're a sinner. Stop pointing the finger at what others do and fix yourself.
This was well written and appreciate the response.
It may surprise you to know that I agree with much of what you have said.
Obviously I believe in sin. I also believe everyone is a sinner including Christians. That would be why we All need a Savior.
I am in agreement with you that many self proclaimed Christians handle the battle of sin in a way that would be offensive to God. The way to battle is love and service. It is not running around pointing out the sins of others. We are to try to be like Jesus. He did love all. He did not condone sin, but loved and sacrificed himself for all. My personal example is I am one who made alcohol and drugs my god. He delivered me from that. It is not my duty to battle addiction/sin by pointing out people who are in bondage or telling them to quit. It is to answer the call and help others who may want help in escaping this bondage. I am not more loved by God for doing this and I do not do this to earn God's love or salvation I do this out of love and gratitude to the One who delivered me. Someone did it for me. I have a love and sadness for those who are stuck in this. It is hard to get the feelings across in writing this. I can assure you that I do not have a holier than thou attitude in this arena. It is more of a good thing that I want to share with those who are in need. I have much to learn on this journey and no way do I think of myself as sinless. I do not want to cast stones.Last edited by Gregg; 11-18-2014, 06:34 PM.
Comment
-
To put it mildly, something like this would be difficult. There must be more to the story, but I can't imagine what the parents must be going through. Just a sad situation, that would really test a parents unconditional love. Hopefully some day they can reconcile.
Caitlyn Ricci, 21, has been battling her parents over college tuition in court since August 2013. On Monday, a judge ruled that Michael Ricci and Maura McGarvey must pay $16,000 toward their daughter’s tuition for Temple University, where Caitlyn is a student. Earlier, another judge ruled the parents, who are divorced, must also foot the bill for a community college she attended before transferring to Temple. In his own words, Michael Ricci offers his take on his family’s ordeal to Yahoo Parenting exclusively.---------------------------------------------
Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
---------------------------------------------
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, 1984
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View PostTo put it mildly, something like this would be difficult. There must be more to the story, but I can't imagine what the parents must be going through. Just a sad situation, that would really test a parents unconditional love. Hopefully some day they can reconcile.
https://www.yahoo.com/parenting/dad-...864515872.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View PostTo put it mildly, something like this would be difficult. There must be more to the story, but I can't imagine what the parents must be going through. Just a sad situation, that would really test a parents unconditional love. Hopefully some day they can reconcile.
https://www.yahoo.com/parenting/dad-...864515872.html
I also believe there is much more to this whole story than we will ever know.
Comment
Comment