Originally posted by Judge Jude
View Post
Yes, the data we have in imprecise, but it is not garbage. I think RHD is trying to show the trends, because that helps us see where this is going and can anticipate when we may hit our first peak. That is valuable information, because it gives us a rough sense for when numbers may start falling and life can return closer to normal. At least, that is how I see the meaning and usefulness of what RHD is doing.
The numbers, so far, have been useful to look at, because they paint a more extreme peak and longer curve than what the WH has suggested. That is a useful corrective, because if we just relying on our fearless leader, we'd have all thought we'd be packing the churches by Easter. That is not going to happen and the numbers RHD has been posting called that before Trump conceded it. So while these numbers won't give us precise totals for infections and deaths--we may not have a full accounting of those for some time--it does give us useful information and helps us know, generally, how bad this will get, and when it will be over.
ETA: Early on your response to this was it wasn't going to be a big deal; that you were going to carry on as normal. That is how most Americans responded, because they were not being told what was likely to happen. This board helped me see what was coming before the MSM did. FS's post about the Washington area gave the warning call. Now, posts by RHD and others help me get a sense of where we are now--seemingly more accurate than if I just clicked on the main headlines about this thing from the MSM. They are behind the curve.
To put it in baseball terms, this is like looking at the daily box scores rather than waiting for BA's hot stove reports to tell us who is doing well.
Comment