Trade Assistance Please!

[Pogues]

10 team, standard yahoo except PPR included.

The offer on the table is:

MY Moreno and Vereen for HIS Foles, Fitzgerald, and T.Smith

My team:
QB (2): Luck, Wilson, Hoyer, Manziel
RB (2): Lacy, Murray, Vereen, Moreno, Hill, Forsett
WR (3): Marshall, Cobb, E. Sanders, Wheaton
TE (1): M.Bennett
We also start a W/R/T


His team:
QB: Rodgers, Ryan, Foles
RB: Foster, Stacy, Rainey, Starks
WR: White, Fitzgerald, A.Johnson, Garcon, Smith
TE: Gronk, Cameron

He said publicly he was looking for a RB. He seems willing to deal Foles, which if I get would allow me to drop both Hoyer and Manziel (hedging bets for bye weeks...). I just don't like the idea of giving up both Vereen and Moreno. I'm willing to deal Vereen, mainly because I'm fairly comfortable with the 3 behind him being able to fill in at least decently on my RB bye weeks.

I don't want two more wide receivers, so the deal seems to be more Moreno/Vereen for Foles/Fitz. He did show interest in Hill, also.

Is Vereen/Hill for Foles/Fitz good? Or should I just go Vereen for Foles? Or what about Vereen/Hill for Foles/Cameron?

RB available: Jackson, Greene, Bradshaw, Ivory, K.Davis, K.Robinson, Rodgers
WR available: Cooper, Nicks, Hawkins, Jennings, Latimer, M.Williams, S.Smith, Quick, Baldwin, Ma.Floyd

Important since dropping 2 QBs if I get Foles allows me to make a pickup or two.

Please help!!!

[Sam]

I wouldn't make that trade - I think it depletes your RB depth too much and doesn't upgrade your WR that much. Foles is nice, I'd probably do Moreno or Vereen for Foles straight up, but I wouldn't give up both Moreno and Vereen in a deal.

10 team, standard yahoo except PPR included.

The offer on the table is:

MY Moreno and Vereen for HIS Foles, Fitzgerald, and T.Smith

My team:
QB (2): Luck, Wilson, Hoyer, Manziel
RB (2): Lacy, Murray, Vereen, Moreno, Hill, Forsett
WR (3): Marshall, Cobb, E. Sanders, Wheaton
TE (1): M.Bennett
We also start a W/R/T


His team:
QB: Rodgers, Ryan, Foles
RB: Foster, Stacy, Rainey, Starks
WR: White, Fitzgerald, A.Johnson, Garcon, Smith
TE: Gronk, Cameron

He said publicly he was looking for a RB. He seems willing to deal Foles, which if I get would allow me to drop both Hoyer and Manziel (hedging bets for bye weeks...). I just don't like the idea of giving up both Vereen and Moreno. I'm willing to deal Vereen, mainly because I'm fairly comfortable with the 3 behind him being able to fill in at least decently on my RB bye weeks.

I don't want two more wide receivers, so the deal seems to be more Moreno/Vereen for Foles/Fitz. He did show interest in Hill, also.

Is Vereen/Hill for Foles/Fitz good? Or should I just go Vereen for Foles? Or what about Vereen/Hill for Foles/Cameron?

RB available: Jackson, Greene, Bradshaw, Ivory, K.Davis, K.Robinson, Rodgers
WR available: Cooper, Nicks, Hawkins, Jennings, Latimer, M.Williams, S.Smith, Quick, Baldwin, Ma.Floyd

Important since dropping 2 QBs if I get Foles allows me to make a pickup or two.

Please help!!!

[Trautdiggity]

I don't like Foles better than Luck and a case could be made that Wilson and Foles end up close in overall value. Fitz shouldn't start over Cobb or Marshall and Sanders very well could outperform in a PPR. To be honest, I don't think I'd do this deal at all.

[revo]

Ditto, no need to do this deal. Foles wouldn't start, and neither would Fitz or Smith. I'd keep the RBs for a better deal.

[jwlincy]

Definitely wouldn't do the original deal: Vereen & Moreno for Foles, Fitzgerald & T. Smith for the reasons already listed (Fitz & Smith aren't a big upgrade at WR, both would be your WR3 at best. Foles isn't that big of an upgrade (if at all) over Wilson or Luck. Trading away a bunch of RB depth and not improving your starting lineup).

I'd prefer the RB depth over upgrading your bye week QB.