Damn they look awful..do they have anything left at all?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pujols and Hamilton...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Sour Masher View PostI think Pujols is going to have a great year."I lingered round them, under that benign sky: watched the moths fluttering among the heath and harebells, listened to the soft wind breathing through the grass, and wondered how any one could ever imagine unquiet slumbers for the sleepers in that quiet earth."
Comment
-
I dont own either of them. They just look old....maybe they both have good seasons, but i wouldn't bet much on that."I lingered round them, under that benign sky: watched the moths fluttering among the heath and harebells, listened to the soft wind breathing through the grass, and wondered how any one could ever imagine unquiet slumbers for the sleepers in that quiet earth."
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by cleo View PostIt's pretty easy to connect the dots. Just research Chris Mihfeld and his link to known PED users.I'm just here for the baseball.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chancellor View PostSo, if his PED program is so good, why would he quit? Let's take this argument to the logical conclusion - baseball's testing program, though vastly improved, is still nowhere near as rigorous as cycling was. Albert Pujols has access to at least as much money as Lance Armstrong did. Armstrong, under a vastly more rigorous program, was never caught. Had Pujols been using, and never caught, why would he stop when he joined the Angels? Because of fear of being caught? C'mon, don't make me laugh. Because of fear of a 50-day suspension? <Snicker> Because of fear of losing sponsorships? Really? With a $250+ million contract? Uh, no.Considering his only baseball post in the past year was bringing up a 3 year old thread to taunt Hornsby and he's never contributed a dime to our hatpass, perhaps?
Comment
-
Originally posted by chancellor View PostSo, if his PED program is so good, why would he quit? Let's take this argument to the logical conclusion - baseball's testing program, though vastly improved, is still nowhere near as rigorous as cycling was. Albert Pujols has access to at least as much money as Lance Armstrong did. Armstrong, under a vastly more rigorous program, was never caught. Had Pujols been using, and never caught, why would he stop when he joined the Angels? Because of fear of being caught? C'mon, don't make me laugh. Because of fear of a 50-day suspension? <Snicker> Because of fear of losing sponsorships? Really? With a $250+ million contract? Uh, no.
All speculation on my part, of course, and I'd be happy to be wrong, because Pujols seems like a genuinely good dude, but I just call it like I see it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Dane View PostYou began that paragraph with a question that you answered in the end. Once he signed that huge deal, there was no point in ever risking his HoF chances. I posted it here on these boards on the thread that covered his deal with the Angels. I opined that he has been on steroids throughout his career and I would expect him to quit them immediately, now that his image is still immaculate. The precipitous decline in stats I suspect is a combination of a PEDless skillset and that perhaps he's a couple years older than he claims.
All speculation on my part, of course, and I'd be happy to be wrong, because Pujols seems like a genuinely good dude, but I just call it like I see it."Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake."
- Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)
"Your shitty future continues to offend me."
-Warren Ellis
Comment
Comment