If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
MLB suspended Cole Hamels for five games and fined him an undisclosed amount for intentionally throwing at Nationals' outfielder Bryce Harper during Sunday's game.
Hamels hit Harper with a fastball in the first inning of Sunday's game and later admitted that it was intentional. The suspension is the appropriate course of action here, though it's hardly a severe punishment, as his next start will merely be pushed back by a day. Hamels will not appeal and will begin serving the suspension Monday night.
Yeah, I never get the 5 game suspension for a starter...maybe they just can't come up with a way to do it fairly, and worry that it will cause appeal issues if they suspend a starter for longer than a reliever for the same thing?
Yeah, I never get the 5 game suspension for a starter...maybe they just can't come up with a way to do it fairly, and worry that it will cause appeal issues if they suspend a starter for longer than a reliever for the same thing?
I'm with you. But I certainly don't think it would be unfair to give a longer suspension to a starter, so as to ensure that he actually misses some (more than insignificant) time. As is, it's a sad joke.
I'm with you. But I certainly don't think it would be unfair to give a longer suspension to a starter, so as to ensure that he actually misses some (more than insignificant) time. As is, it's a sad joke.
I assume that the number of games means that they lose (#games/162) of their salary for the year, which means that they can't arbitrarily decide to suspend a pitcher 10 games just to make sure he misses a start.
In the best of times, our days are numbered, anyway. And it would be a crime against Nature for any generation to take the world crisis so solemnly that it put off enjoying those things for which we were presumably designed in the first place, and which the gravest statesmen and the hoarsest politicians hope to make available to all men in the end: I mean the opportunity to do good work, to fall in love, to enjoy friends, to sit under trees, to read, to hit a ball and bounce the baby.
Just the fact that he felt the need to brag to everyone about how "old school" he is tells you everything you need to know about this moron. Hamels has always struck me as being one of the softest players in the league.
Interestingly Zimmerman plunked Hamels as well. Hamels best watch his "old school" ways as eventually someone will pitch at his arm.
This was not a smart move in a contract year.
I think they only suspended him for 5 games because MLB didn't really care that Hamels plunked Harper. People have been hit by a pitch thousands of time without suspensions (even intentional ones) but I think he got the suspension because he admitted it was intentional. MLB doesn't want pitchers admitting that. If they did care about the beaning it would have been a 10 game suspension. Just my take.
And I do agree that the 5 game suspension for starting pitchers is a joke.
I'm unconsoled I'm lonely, I am so much better than I used to be.
I'd say minimum of two months (because it will be appealed and reduced).
Not for hitting Harper, but for utter stupidity.
Minimum of two months? That's crazy talk.
Not at all unusual for a cocky rook to get plunked. If Hamels had thrown at his head, that would be a different matter.
Everybody knows (for the most part) when a pitcher hits someone on purpose. They never get suspended. Admitting that he did it is what got Hamels suspended, and properly so, but the penalty shouldn't be any more severe for plunking Harper than it should for plunking Konerko or anyone else.
Other than the Harper plunking, when has anyone called for a two month suspension for a pitcher hitting someone nowhere near the head?
Comment