Tweet
Obama
Perry
Gingrich (egads!)
Perry
Gingrich (egads!)
-
-
1. Obama
2. Huntsman
3. Paul (Proving how silly these things are-- I think the guy should be in a rubber room somewhere)."There is involved in this struggle the question whether your children and my children shall enjoy the privileges we have enjoyed. I say this in order to impress upon you, if you are not already so impressed, that no small matter should divert us from our great purpose. "
Abraham Lincoln, from his Address to the Ohio One Hundred Sixty Fourth Volunteer InfantryComment
-
i kept looking for the "none of the above" option, but could never find it, so i bailed out.~ all in all is all we are ~
kcComment
-
Looks like Huntsman Obama could be a good matchup lolComment
-
1) Obama
2) Paul
3) HuntsmanComment
-
Bizarre. Huntsman, no surprise, then Obama and Perry.
Its is amazing how many questions had no good answer. This is what comes of oversimplification.
JAd Astra per Aspera
Oh. In that case, never mind.
- Wonderboy
GITH fails logic 101. - bryanbutler
Bah...OJH caught me. - Pogues
I don't know if you guys are being willfully ignorant, but... - Judge JudeComment
-
1. Obama
2. Huntsman
3. Romney
but i hated some of these questions. for instance:
HOT TOPICS: GAY MARRIAGE
Should gay marriage be legal across the country?
1. We must pass a constitutional amendment outlawing gay marriage
2. This should be up to the individual states
3. Traditional marriage is between a man and a woman, but I support civil unions
4. My views on gay marriage are evolving. But no law should ban gay marriage outright
seriously? where is the option for "i think gay marriage should be allowed, just like marriage between a man and a woman?" my views are not "evolving," they've been that way for a very long time. and, no, i don't think it should be limited to civil unions. and, no, it shouldn't be up to the states.
sigh."Instead of all of this energy and effort directed at the war to end drugs, how about a little attention to drugs which will end war?" Albert HofmannComment
-
I also hated some of the options, but I'm pretty sure they took them from the candidates' stated positions on the issues. So if there wasn't an option that fit your views, it was because there isn't a candidate who has stated a position that fits your views.Originally posted by bryanbutler View Post
I agree that sucks on several of the issues, but unfortunately I think that's an accurate representation of the field of candidates."Jesus said to them, 'Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are going into the kingdom of God ahead of you.'"Comment
-
1. Obama
2. Huntsman
3. Perry
Comment
-
Crap!!
Mine came up:
Reagan
Clinton
BhobComment
-
Me, too! How the hell did Perry get in there?!Originally posted by BigJonEmpire View Post
Anyway, Obama (8)
Huntsman (2)
Perry (1)“Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.”
-Ralph Waldo EmersonComment
-
1. Obama
2. Huntsman
3. RomneyComment
-
-
Obama (7)
Romney (2)
Bachmann (1) -- Seriously?Originally posted by Kevin SeitzerComment
-
Yeah, it's more amusement than science.
But I got
1. Romney
2. Obama
3. Paul
Quite the trifecta!
I'd pick Huntsman, yet am one of the few here who didn't land him in his top 3
talk about a wishy-washy voter
lolfinished 10th in this 37th yr in 11-team-only NL 5x5
own picks 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 in April 2022 1st-rd farmhand draft
won in 2017 15 07 05 04 02 93 90 84
SP SGray 16, TWalker 10, AWood 10, Price 3, KH Kim 2, Corbin 10
RP Bednar 10, Bender 10, Graterol 2
C Stallings 2, Casali 1
1B Votto 10, 3B ERios 2, 1B Zimmerman 2, 2S Chisholm 5, 2B Hoerner 5, 2B Solano 2, 2B LGarcia 10, SS Gregorius 17
OF Cain 14, Bader 1, Daza 1Comment
Comment