Originally posted by Sour Masher
View Post
As I've mentioned, I think if you try to make an example of Will Smith by removing him from the Academy when they've never done the same for multiple convicted rapists, then yeah, their priorities are fucked up. I know Smith voluntarily resigned, but I've also heard there's a committee meeting to decide his fate within the Academy. My assertion is that removing him because what he did is worse than previous members is 100% laughable grandstanding. Unless they want to start down the 'morals clause' route, in which case we'll be spending Oscar season debating which actors and actresses are bigger cretins in their personal lives as opposed to acting talent. That prospect doesn't thrill me. But if you advocate for Smith's removal, you must advocate for a full-on witch hunt. I disagree with that approach. But I'm also 100% in support of a steroid wing in the MLB HOF, so I'm coming in with a different perspective than most. I would hope nobody wants to go the MLB HOF route.
Comment