just a vent, but give an opinion

[SMELL THE GLOVE]

Trade:
I give- Leshoure, Gates, Akers
I get- Spiller, Daniels, Tynes

edit: this trade was vetoed,

good veto, bad veto????

[Sam]

I think it was a good deal for you, but I don't think it was veto-able

[revo]

if this trade was vetoed, then why bother with trades in the league? This deal leaned in your favor, but there's no way on earth it was veto-able.

[Erik]

That's ridiculous.

[SMELL THE GLOVE]

I think it was a good deal for you, but I don't think it was veto-able

That's what I thought. It's an nfl.com league where nfl.com controls veto, the owners have no say. The whole season has been crazy.

An owner traded middlings for Peterson, then AJ Green. So, I complained when he traded Romo for Rogers.

I said something like, hey you might want to see if there's some collusion between these 3 teams, they seem to be funneling all the best players to one roster. nfl.com response, " no collusion they are from different teams."

Not sure what the problem is, but I think my veto was in response to my complaint. Seems like the site is run by kids. Sorta think the greedmeister works for said website.

[Sam]

I've never tried a league through NFL.com but at this rate, I won't want to any time soon. Time to look for a new league host!

That's what I thought. It's an nfl.com league where nfl.com controls veto, the owners have no say. The whole season has been crazy.

An owner traded middlings for Peterson, then AJ Green. So, I complained when he traded Romo for Rogers.

I said something like, hey you might want to see if there's some collusion between these 3 teams, they seem to be funneling all the best players to one roster. nfl.com response, " no collusion they are from different teams."

Not sure what the problem is, but I think my veto was in response to my complaint. Seems like the site is run by kids. Sorta think the greedmeister works for said website.

[Erik]

It's an nfl.com league where nfl.com controls veto, the owners have no say.

That's the dumbest system I've ever heard of.

[Pauly]

Trade:
I give- Leshoure, Gates, Akers
I get- Spiller, Daniels, Tynes

edit: this trade was vetoed,

good veto, bad veto????

Well if you asked me why it was vetoed, I would say you are getting the better RB, the better TE and the better K in the deal. I guess Leshoure and Spiller are close, but this looks questionable to me.