Originally posted by johnnya24
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
*** VD 15 Commentary Thread ***
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by cavebird View PostI really wasn't. I simply replied to correct an obvious typo in a computer thing that I didn't understand at all without catching it. So no, I wasn't "using" it. I was just going by the spreadsheet pretty much.
So it's either, you forgot, which is fine. Or you were just blindly going by the spreadsheet, which I believe you were on the side of *not* supporting when we talked about finding players that may not be on there, remember?
Comment
-
Yeah ... and I fixed the error ... that is the original error of leaving out the 1999-2005 (inclusive) rule. However, I got it wrong and included 2004 rather than 2005. That's on me. These things happen when you are doing 50 things at once.
I didn't realize the error / inconsistency after than, and no-one else pointed it out directly ... except amorphous discussions about 2004, or 1999-2004.
If people knew there was actual incorrect data on the spreadsheet for players, I don't recall anyone telling me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cavebird View PostI am fine with both 2004 and selection 2 (and to answer whoever's question--I forget who asked---I am sure it is the name he uses inside of prison (or at least jail) since that is where he is). Agreed on great pick with Keeler. And since you knew you would be taking King, you knew what your team would sort of end up looking like---you were definitely playing the strategy all along---grabbing Bradley before I could snake you on him.
I had a soft-lock on Silver King when you made the comment, but 2 players could have theoretically used a Wildcard on him, so I kept schtum.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ken View Postok, but it's a little disingenuous to claim you didn't know the rule was 2004 and you would have picked someone else when we were literally discussing the formula and you chimed in.
So it's either, you forgot, which is fine. Or you were just blindly going by the spreadsheet, which I believe you were on the side of *not* supporting when we talked about finding players that may not be on there, remember?
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnnya24 View PostIn amongst this clusterfuck, no love for the Jamie "Mutherfucking" Quirk pick?
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnnya24 View PostIn amongst this clusterfuck, no love for the Jamie "Mutherfucking" Quirk pick?---------------------------------------------
Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
---------------------------------------------
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, 1984
Comment
-
And this is going to get really scary at the end. My Vaughn pick was more or less out of necessity--I really didn't want to burn a DB slot or CHC on him. I finally finished my review of "V" and Vaughn was in a tier with 3 or 4 other guys who were still undrafted. And I was franchise excluded from taking all of them. Decades cause problems, but the franchise issues are weirder and, I think, require more advance planning (which can easily get blown up). The tactics of snaking other people on players will get really interesting.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cavebird View PostDecades cause problems, but the franchise issues are weirder and, I think, require more advance planning (which can easily get blown up). The tactics of snaking other people on players will get really interesting.
Comment
-
I have found 7 more hitters who would be Normal instead of Contemporary now and might be drafted (none of them might be drafted, too, nobody obvious). Can we temporarily waive the no name-dropping rule to list them so everyone is on the same page?
Comment
-
Originally posted by cavebird View PostI have found 7 more hitters who would be Normal instead of Contemporary now and might be drafted (none of them might be drafted, too, nobody obvious). Can we temporarily waive the no name-dropping rule to list them so everyone is on the same page?
...I'm not expecting to grow flowers in the desert...
Comment
Comment