*** VD 15 Commentary Thread ***

[heyelander]

you are correct

we shall see ….

[DMT]

The rookie taking advantage of the rest of our servitude to the spreadsheet, gotta love it.

[johnnya24]

Anyway ... do we stick to 2004, in which case I change everyone in the spreadsheet to 2004, or do we revert to 2005 from this point onwards (the spreadsheet classification of "normal" and contemporary will have been based on the "correct" year 2005)

There is no good answer here.

[DMT]

Anyway ... do we stick to 2004, in which case I change everyone in the spreadsheet to 2004, or do we revert to 2005 from this point onwards (the spreadsheet classification of "normal" and contemporary will have been based on the "correct" year 2005)

There is no good answer here.

Do you know how many players would be affected by the change?

[Ken]

The rookie taking advantage of the rest of our servitude to the spreadsheet, gotta love it.

I mean, revo and Adam and heye and I were using 2004 as well, at least at some point according to posts in this thread...

[heyelander]

I mean, revo and Adam and heye and I were using 2004 as well, at least at some point according to posts in this thread...

woah, woah, woah... I was just cutting and pasting shit. I wasn't cross-referencing or scouring B-R for market inefficiencies or what not.

[Ken]

woah, woah, woah... I was just cutting and pasting shit. I wasn't cross-referencing or scouring B-R for market inefficiencies or what not.

lol, I know - but your post included 2004

[jmaeroff]

He wasn't looking at the spreadsheet.

I wasn't looking at the spreadsheet, and did not know of (nor had any reason to suspect) any discrepancy. The rules said 1999-2004 and I use BB-Ref to check when players debuted.

[Ken]

I wasn't looking at the spreadsheet, and did not know of (nor had any reason to suspect) any discrepancy. The rules said 1999-2004 and I use BB-Ref to check when players debuted.

Perfect -- welcome to the good guys team. Don't let them pull you over to the dark side.

[johnnya24]

Anyway ... do we stick to 2004, in which case I change everyone in the spreadsheet to 2004, or do we revert to 2005 from this point onwards (the spreadsheet classification of "normal" and contemporary will have been based on the "correct" year 2005)

There is no good answer here.

- I think we have to go with the 2004 as per the rules. In which case I will update the spreadsheet with this information.

I need enough people to agree or disagree with this, or it'll be poll time.

[johnnya24]

I think it's reasonable to pause the draft until this is resolved.

[Ken]

- I think we have to go with the 2004 as per the rules. In which case I will update the spreadsheet with this information.

I need enough people to agree or disagree with this, or it'll be poll time.

agree, 2004

[DMT]

- I think we have to go with the 2004 as per the rules. In which case I will update the spreadsheet with this information.

I need enough people to agree or disagree with this, or it'll be poll time.

Fine by me.

[jmaeroff]

agree, 2004

I agree too.

[Bene Futuis]

I vote for 2007