Originally posted by johnnya24
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
*** VD 11 Commentary Thread ***
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by eldiablo505Heh, I couldn't really tell if you were lauding or disparaging my Kelly pick.
Then again, Kelly often goes in the 3rd in regular drafts, so it's gotta be a good pick either way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnnya24 View PostI haven't done any value modification for the decades, so I have no clue about the values in this draft. I'm probably not going to bother. Couldn't even guess if Kelly's 1880's or 1870's year is more valuable.
Then again, Kelly often goes in the 3rd in regular drafts, so it's gotta be a good pick either way.Considering his only baseball post in the past year was bringing up a 3 year old thread to taunt Hornsby and he's never contributed a dime to our hatpass, perhaps?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pogues View PostLike my Anson pick, I believe the 1870s year for Kelly is a better choice than the 1880s year, valuation speaking. Like my 1880s Anson pick, I think El Diablo still made the smarter choice.
1870's fo life!
Comment
-
Originally posted by eldiablo505Hmm, Spalding's stats appear to have gotten worse since the last time I looked at his B-R page.
And, yeah, that BY WHIP isn't so awful.....until you notice it's over 570 IP!
Comment
Comment