Wanting to tweak a rule in our 16-team mixed keeper league.
We have a very active league, lots of trades, and I have no interest in adding a veto rule or anything like that. We have a lot of keeper trades every season — contenders trade their cheap prospects for more expensive players for the stretch run. All good.
But right at our deadline, we always have a few deals that seem to be made just for the sake of making a deal. As in, the last few studs are dealt for very marginal, "maybe I'll keep this guy" players. We have an early trade deadline, on purpose, but that means there's a legitimate chance one of these guys might be worth keeping, but more often than not they don't pan out.
So, there's no impropriety going on, but it would still be nice if there was a way to make these marginal deals less common. One simple way would be to lower the salary cap, i suppose. Just wondering if there's any other ideas?
We have a very active league, lots of trades, and I have no interest in adding a veto rule or anything like that. We have a lot of keeper trades every season — contenders trade their cheap prospects for more expensive players for the stretch run. All good.
But right at our deadline, we always have a few deals that seem to be made just for the sake of making a deal. As in, the last few studs are dealt for very marginal, "maybe I'll keep this guy" players. We have an early trade deadline, on purpose, but that means there's a legitimate chance one of these guys might be worth keeping, but more often than not they don't pan out.
So, there's no impropriety going on, but it would still be nice if there was a way to make these marginal deals less common. One simple way would be to lower the salary cap, i suppose. Just wondering if there's any other ideas?
Comment