Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Was 2016's HR surge just random?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Was 2016's HR surge just random?

    There has been a lot of discussion and speculation why the HR totals in 2016 were so high. Many have claimed that the ball must be juiced, despite, AFAIK, complete lack of evidence. MLB also has denied the juicing, and I can't think of any motive for them to lie about this. I thought I would try to investigate.

    I looked at the avg MLB stats for the standard batting categories from 2000 to present to see if I could tell anything. HR totals have bounced up and down during this period, w higher totals before PED testing started in 2003 and especially higher totals before the advent of pitch/Fx in 2007. HR totals, as well as Runs totals, reached a low point in 2014 (4186 & 19761), and have risen dramatically in each of the last 2 years (4909, 5610 & 20647, 21744), w 2016 HR totals being the highest since 2000, which was in the prime of the PEDs era. Offensive stats in general decreased steadily from 2007 to 2014 but HRs have bounced up and down during this period. 2014 seems even more peculiar than 2016 in that there were far fewer HRs that year than any other year that I looked at (never heard anyone claim that the ball was deadened that year, tho). The 2014 Runs total was the lowest, too, but not by nearly as much as HRs. The dramatic rise in HR and Runs in 2015 seems not so much a surge in offense as it was a return to the mean from the unusually low totals of 2014.

    I thought that batted ball data might provide some possible answers. It stands to reason that higher hard contact rates, higher pull rates and higher fly ball rates might account for the HR surge. I looked at MLB batted ball data back to 2007. Hard contact % did rise in 2016 but so did soft contact as medium contact declined. There were even more dramatic rises in hard contact rate from 2009 to 2010 and from 2011 to 2012. HRs did rise dramatically from 2011 to 2012 but actually dropped dramatically from 2009 to 2010. Pull rate also rose in 2016 but actually was higher in 2014 when HRs were at a recent historic low. Pull rates havent seemed to vary much in this period, never changing by even as much as 1.5% year to year. Hard/Medium/Soft contact rates have bounced up and down. I'm not sure how much I trust the contact statistics because in 2011 hard contact rate was dramatically lower and soft contact was dramatically higher than any other year before returning to more normal levels the next year. The HRs and Runs that year were rather low but not nearly as low as 2014 which had normal hard and soft contact rates. Fly ball rates are down somewhat in the last 5 years and line drive rates are up some during this time. The 2016 FB rate was up a bit but both the FB and LD rates were virtually the same as the historically low HR year of 2014.

    My conclusion from this is that the 2016 HR rate is probably mostly random variation, w possibly some help from the increase in hard contact. I would expect that it will regress to a more normal figure for the pitch/Fx era, which is an average of 4834, which is very close to the 2015 total.

    A few other interesting items: Strikeouts have increased every year since 2005. Walks have gone up and down and then up again the last 2 years, but are about the same now as they were in 2005. Runs have gone down every year since 2006 before increasing the last 2 years. Interestingly, the average age of MLB players has gone done or stayed the same since 2004, decreasing from 29.3 to 28.4 during that time. Perhaps this is because of careers being shortened by the discouraging of PED use brought about by testing.
    Last edited by rhd; 01-02-2017, 06:34 PM.

  • #2
    I haven't gone into the numbers like you have, but anecdotally, it seems to me that the whole game has embraced HRs like it always has, but has forgiven the strikeout to such a point that as long as a guy can take a walk, he can strike out as much as he wants and teams will still covet him as long as he has power. So, that means strikeouts will rise and HRs will rise as well, but be more subject to year-to-year factors like weather, injuries to key power guys, how certain umps are calling things, etc. The strikeouts number should have a more fluid arc because the sample size is so big.

    Just my non-math thoughts.

    Comment


    • #3
      Pitcher velo goes up every year
      It's getting warmer every year
      Teams developing pull power hitters
      Homers were up +723 from 2015 to 2016 and +701 from 2015 to this past season. Baseball has not had back to back years of homers improving from one season to the next since 2003 to 2004.

      SEASON PA HR DIFF
      2001 186,933 5,458 n/a
      2002 186,632 5,059 -399
      2003 187,460 5,207 148
      2004 188,541 5,451 244
      2005 186,294 5,017 -434
      2006 188,071 5,386 369
      2007 188,623 4,957 -429
      2008 187,631 4,878 -79
      2009 187,079 5,042 164
      2010 185,553 4,613 -429
      2011 185,245 4,552 -61
      2012 184,179 4,934 382
      2013 184,872 4,661 -273
      2014 183,928 4,186 -475
      2015 183,627 4,909 723
      2016 184,580 5,610 701
      good read on it prior to last season: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.9e42f60132e8

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Moonlight J View Post
        ...good read on it prior to last season: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.9e42f60132e8
        That article suggests some possible reasons for the surge, but none of it seems definitive. At the end, the article itself suggests that it may be mostly due to random variation, which was what I concluded.

        It will be interesting to see what happens in 2017 but for now I'm not changing my approach towards valuation of hitters.

        Comment


        • #5
          given we've never had 3 straight years of HR growth, I'm not ready to say 20 HRs is the new 15 HRs either.

          Comment


          • #6
            I wonder what role arm injuries and teams' concern about arm injuries has played? It seems like we are seeing more pitchers get injured, but I have not looked at the data enough to know whether that subjective feeling is true. But if true, replacing a starter with a AAAA arm or relying more on middle relievers may play some role in this?

            Comment


            • #7
              I credit the focus on "launch angle" by hitters
              "You know what's wrong with America? If I lovingly tongue a woman's nipple in a movie, it gets an "NC-17" rating, if I chop it off with a machete, it's an "R". That's what's wrong with America, man...."--Dennis Hopper

              "One should judge a man mainly from his depravities. Virtues can be faked. Depravities are real." -- Klaus Kinski

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Fresno Bob View Post
                I credit the focus on "launch angle" by hitters
                If launch angle had increased then the fly ball rate should have increased also. But it hasnt. 2016 FB rate is about the same as the historically low HR year of 2014.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Well, we've all speculated on it a lot. Many independent studies seemed to prove it. Now, MLB finally admits it, although they still say they do not know exactly what the science behind it is--the new balls since 2015 have contributed to the HR spike. This idea has been mentioned in several threads, but I wanted to necro this one to give kudos to RHD for his thoughtful OP.

                  https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/mlb...q94?li=BBnb7Kz

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    For the record, HRs rose again dramatically in 2017, to an all-time record of 6105. Runs also rose dramatically to 22582, an increase of 3.85%. So much for my theory.

                    In 2018 so far, there have been 1635 HR and 6357 R, which would project to 5484 HR and 21322 R which would be a dramatic decrease. Also, batting average is only .244, down from .255 in 2017. Too early to draw any conclusions as this may be because of being early in the season.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      weather in half the country was a disaster in April and well into May
                      the HR rate is about to climb
                      finished 10th in this 37th yr in 11-team-only NL 5x5
                      own picks 1, 2, 5, 6, 9 in April 2022 1st-rd farmhand draft
                      won in 2017 15 07 05 04 02 93 90 84

                      SP SGray 16, TWalker 10, AWood 10, Price 3, KH Kim 2, Corbin 10
                      RP Bednar 10, Bender 10, Graterol 2
                      C Stallings 2, Casali 1
                      1B Votto 10, 3B ERios 2, 1B Zimmerman 2, 2S Chisholm 5, 2B Hoerner 5, 2B Solano 2, 2B LGarcia 10, SS Gregorius 17
                      OF Cain 14, Bader 1, Daza 1

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X