Our league is possibly losing the 1-3 owners. I can't imagine we will replace all three so that means from 33-99 players will be dumped back into the player pool.
We are also going to expand reserve rosters from 10-17 meaning we're draining at the very least 84 players from the pool. Now at 15 teams that meant going deep into the minors and international players, but should we end up with 12 teams, not really.
We also move from 10 MLB keeps +3 minor keeps to 15 keeps of any kind (rookies still don't count against the cap.
My thoughts are that while it WAS smart to hold big contracts and borderline at value keeps, should the league contract in ownership while expanding in roster size, that there will be a lot of players going under value and that having extra money and roster space is the way to go.
Am I seeing this correctly?
We are also going to expand reserve rosters from 10-17 meaning we're draining at the very least 84 players from the pool. Now at 15 teams that meant going deep into the minors and international players, but should we end up with 12 teams, not really.
We also move from 10 MLB keeps +3 minor keeps to 15 keeps of any kind (rookies still don't count against the cap.
My thoughts are that while it WAS smart to hold big contracts and borderline at value keeps, should the league contract in ownership while expanding in roster size, that there will be a lot of players going under value and that having extra money and roster space is the way to go.
Am I seeing this correctly?
Comment