Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pace of Play changes approved

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pace of Play changes approved

    This is mildly interesting news straight from FoxSports:

    Major League Baseball and the MLB Players Association announced Friday four rule changes aimed at improving pace of play. News of the changes were first reported by FOX Sports' Jon Morosi and Ken Rosenthal.

    ● Managers must make instant replay challenges from the dugout, rather than the field. This should eliminate the on-field delays that occurred in 2014 while managers chatted with umpires while waiting for coaches or video coordinators to recommend whether a play should be challenged.
    ● Hitters must keep one foot in the batter’s box between pitches, unless an established exception occurs. It’s not clear how many exceptions will exist, but during a trial run in the 2014 Arizona Fall League, those conditions included foul balls, foul tips, time being granted by the umpire, and wild pitches.
    ● Play will resume promptly once television broadcasts return from commercial breaks.
    ● Timed pitching changes.

    Penalties for all violations will start in May and will include minimal fines, not balls, strikes. The idea is to change players' habits, not penalize them. As with replay, rules will be adjusted as needed during the course of the season.
    "Players are willing to consider certain things relating to improving the game," MLBPA executive director Tony Clark said. "Players are always interested in doing that. But they are always sensitive to making adjustments that will adversely affect the game. They love it, respect it too much to try and reinvent the wheel in such a way that will damage the game."

  • #2
    Originally posted by Pauly View Post
    Penalties for all violations will start in May and will include minimal fines, not balls, strikes.
    well at least that's something.

    Still, as a hitter I think I'd fall into a pattern of requesting time on every pitch, unless the umps get grumpy about it.
    It certainly feels that way. But I'm distrustful of that feeling and am curious about evidence.

    Comment


    • #3
      i think the effect of the "one foot in the batter's box" remains to be seen. if they have one foot in, does that mean the pitcher can pitch? or do they have to wait until both feet are in?

      at least they're trying though. i don't think we need 2 hour games, but getting significantly above 3 hours is a bit much, IMHO...
      "Instead of all of this energy and effort directed at the war to end drugs, how about a little attention to drugs which will end war?" Albert Hofmann

      Comment


      • #4
        You know what is better than a three hour baseball game......a four hour one!
        "You know what's wrong with America? If I lovingly tongue a woman's nipple in a movie, it gets an "NC-17" rating, if I chop it off with a machete, it's an "R". That's what's wrong with America, man...."--Dennis Hopper

        "One should judge a man mainly from his depravities. Virtues can be faked. Depravities are real." -- Klaus Kinski

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Pauly View Post
          ● Timed pitching changes.
          The increased number of pitching changes is the biggest reason why the games are getting longer. The additional trips to the mound (which should also be timed) by the manager/pitching coach and the additional warmup pitches add a lot of time to the game. I think that the number of warmup pitches should be reduced from 8 to 5 between each half inning. And relief pitchers that warmed up in the bullpen should only get 3 warmup pitches on the field to acclimate themselves to the field mound. Reducing warmup pitches by 51-66 pitches per game could trim 10-12 minutes off the game time.
          “Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”

          ― Albert Einstein

          Comment


          • #6
            How much would they save if television were forced to work around breaks in the game, instead of the other way around? I know that commercials, etc. come during during natural breaks, but the action is often ready to resume before the commercials are over.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Lucky View Post
              How much would they save if television were forced to work around breaks in the game, instead of the other way around? I know that commercials, etc. come during during natural breaks, but the action is often ready to resume before the commercials are over.
              Get the commie!
              If DMT didn't exist we would have to invent it. There has to be a weirdest thing. Once we have the concept weird, there has to be a weirdest thing. And DMT is simply it.
              - Terence McKenna

              Bullshit is everywhere. - George Carlin (& Jon Stewart)

              How old would you be if you didn't know how old you are? - Satchel Paige

              Comment

              Working...
              X