Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

July 4th

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Art Vandelay View Post
    history.

    like slavery.

    normal people live in today, victims who hate their own life live in the past.

    Arizona is about to announce the FORENSIC audit results of the 'safest, freest, most secure election ever'...
    Not only are you a deluded wanker, but you have no idea that I'm currently outside your house spraying 5G waves into your food.
    If I whisper my wicked marching orders into the ether with no regard to where or how they may bear fruit, I am blameless should a broken spirit carry those orders out upon the innocent, for it was not my hand that took the action merely my lips which let slip their darkest wish. ~Daniel Devereaux 2011

    Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    Martin Luther King, Jr.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Art Vandelay View Post
      I did not suggest there was cheating in Canadian elections (though in hindsight, I am open to believing it could/does happen in Canada). I wrote trudo wants to bring dominion machines into Canadian voting.

      Interestingly, when the news first broke regarding dominion machines, dominion cleared out of their Toronto offices shared with george soros organization. middle of the night exit.

      Looking back at the most recent federal election results, here are some points. trudo had the lowest winning percentage in the history of Canadian federal elections (33% of the vote). only the second time ever under 35% for the elected prime minister. didn't win the popular vote. won just 14 seats out of 95 west of Ontario. Did not win a seat in Sask or Alberta. trudo essentially was elected based on Ontario/Quebec voters. the comparison is, for example, similar to Michigan. Wayne county votes control the entire state results.
      I misunderstood apparently. So the cheating was in the U.S. election ? I am sure many here would also be interested in links documenting that unspeakable outrage.
      ---------------------------------------------
      Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
      ---------------------------------------------
      The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
      George Orwell, 1984

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by GwynnInTheHall View Post
        Not only are you a deluded wanker, but you have no idea that I'm currently outside your house spraying 5G waves into your food.
        I sure hope you aren't also spraying the COVID vaccine, that would be too much
        ---------------------------------------------
        Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
        ---------------------------------------------
        The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
        George Orwell, 1984

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Art Vandelay View Post
          I did not suggest there was cheating in Canadian elections (though in hindsight, I am open to believing it could/does happen in Canada). I wrote trudo wants to bring dominion machines into Canadian voting.
          A number of Quebec separatists claimed the last Quebec independence vote was rigged. I was actually working in Quebec in '95 for that fun and games.
          I'm just here for the baseball.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by chancellor View Post
            A number of Quebec separatists claimed the last Quebec independence vote was rigged. I was actually working in Quebec in '95 for that fun and games.
            That explains a lot...nothing to drink but Labatts must have done a real number on ya..........
            If I whisper my wicked marching orders into the ether with no regard to where or how they may bear fruit, I am blameless should a broken spirit carry those orders out upon the innocent, for it was not my hand that took the action merely my lips which let slip their darkest wish. ~Daniel Devereaux 2011

            Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
            Martin Luther King, Jr.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Art Vandelay View Post
              You are wrong about Canada being one of the most liberal countries. in power currently is trudo, caught over and over and over and over again as a fake feminist, mentally ill, non-stop lying, groping cancer on my country. there is ample smoke that trudo is the son of fidel.castro. trudo the maggot "I respect the chinese way of government" and "Canada needs to become a post-state nation". trudo ended up winning just 14 seats out of 95 possible west of Ontario (half of the country geographically speaking). two entire provinces didn't elect a single member from his party. trudo the groper knew he was in trouble and had your guy hussein o'bama come here and campaign on his behalf to all the braindead. and even with all the OBVIOUS cheating via the dominion machines in 2020, dirt bag trudo is now trying to push for vote-by-machine.

              like I wrote, liberalism is a mental illness
              I am curious, so I hope you will indulge me. Are there every times that you recognize or accept that your "side" is either lying to you and does not have your best interest at heart, or is wildly misinformed and spreading that misinformation like a disease? Or do you just ignore any instances of that happening? Specifically, when the pandemic was first starting you shared a source from your echo chamber that indicated that pandemic was a liberal conspiracy, that the hospitals were empty and that people were not really getting sick. Do you 1. still believe that the pandemic is a liberal conspiracy, or 2. accept that it was and is real and that those right-wing sources pushing that narrative it was not real or not serious were either lying to you or wrong?

              I'm wondering what the relationship is between a right-wing conspiracy theorist and the right-wing media. Does the media lead you to believe that stuff, or do you believe it before the media says it, and seek out media that confirms it? Do you reject a media source when it does not conform to scientific truths and fact-checked reality, or do you instead reject it when it does not reinforce your own belief system? Does your belief system ever allow that your political opponents might be right about something and your political allies might be wrong about something?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Sour Masher View Post
                I am curious, so I hope you will indulge me. Are there every times that you recognize or accept that your "side" is either lying to you and does not have your best interest at heart, or is wildly misinformed and spreading that misinformation like a disease? Or do you just ignore any instances of that happening? Specifically, when the pandemic was first starting you shared a source from your echo chamber that indicated that pandemic was a liberal conspiracy, that the hospitals were empty and that people were not really getting sick. Do you 1. still believe that the pandemic is a liberal conspiracy, or 2. accept that it was and is real and that those right-wing sources pushing that narrative it was not real or not serious were either lying to you or wrong?

                I'm wondering what the relationship is between a right-wing conspiracy theorist and the right-wing media. Does the media lead you to believe that stuff, or do you believe it before the media says it, and seek out media that confirms it? Do you reject a media source when it does not conform to scientific truths and fact-checked reality, or do you instead reject it when it does not reinforce your own belief system? Does your belief system ever allow that your political opponents might be right about something and your political allies might be wrong about something?
                Shut up, you communist.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View Post
                  I misunderstood apparently. So the cheating was in the U.S. election ? I am sure many here would also be interested in links documenting that unspeakable outrage.


                  why is left afraid of a forensic audit if the 2020 was the safest, most secure election ever? I would think they would say "lets do it, lets prove we won fair and square". Instead, the dem national party sent 73 lawyers in an attempt to stop the Arizona audit. honest people simply do not send close to a hundred attorney's to stop what would clearly show they won if they had nothing to fear.

                  I am curious. if the Arizona forensic audit results show the state voting should not have been certified, are you going to 1/ believe 2/ accept 3/ be outraged that something as important as the national election was tampered with?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Art Vandelay View Post
                    why is left afraid of a forensic audit if the 2020 was the safest, most secure election ever? I would think they would say "lets do it, lets prove we won fair and square". Instead, the dem national party sent 73 lawyers in an attempt to stop the Arizona audit. honest people simply do not send close to a hundred attorney's to stop what would clearly show they won if they had nothing to fear.

                    I am curious. if the Arizona forensic audit results show the state voting should not have been certified, are you going to 1/ believe 2/ accept 3/ be outraged that something as important as the national election was tampered with?
                    I am not afraid, and I am not claiming anything. I just asked you to proved some documentation for your claims. So if you have some documentation please post it
                    ---------------------------------------------
                    Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
                    ---------------------------------------------
                    The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
                    George Orwell, 1984

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by umjewman View Post
                      Shut up, you communist.
                      I believe the more authentic pejorative is libtard commie bastard.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Sour Masher View Post
                        I believe the more authentic pejorative is libtard commie bastard.
                        Sorry. I will withdraw my comment. Shut up, you libtard commie bastard.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Art Vandelay View Post
                          why is left afraid of a forensic audit if the 2020 was the safest, most secure election ever? I would think they would say "lets do it, lets prove we won fair and square". Instead, the dem national party sent 73 lawyers in an attempt to stop the Arizona audit. honest people simply do not send close to a hundred attorney's to stop what would clearly show they won if they had nothing to fear.

                          I am curious. if the Arizona forensic audit results show the state voting should not have been certified, are you going to 1/ believe 2/ accept 3/ be outraged that something as important as the national election was tampered with?
                          This is fucking hilarious. The "Forensic Audit" is being performed IN SECRET, by a PARTISAN group, a Stop the Steal owned company (Cyber Ninjas) who has NO experience in elections or audits and now has moved the machines, ballots and "audit" out of state to Montana.

                          This AFTER there were already 15 hand counts, the machines examined, tested twice and a real forensic audit conducted by REAL auditors and no voter fraud was found.

                          But hey, you're SERIOUS about people believing any result that come from your chosen Mouth of God Audit.


                          If I whisper my wicked marching orders into the ether with no regard to where or how they may bear fruit, I am blameless should a broken spirit carry those orders out upon the innocent, for it was not my hand that took the action merely my lips which let slip their darkest wish. ~Daniel Devereaux 2011

                          Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
                          Martin Luther King, Jr.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Sour Masher View Post
                            I am curious, so I hope you will indulge me. Are there every times that you recognize or accept that your "side" is either lying to you and does not have your best interest at heart, or is wildly misinformed and spreading that misinformation like a disease? Or do you just ignore any instances of that happening? Specifically, when the pandemic was first starting you shared a source from your echo chamber that indicated that pandemic was a liberal conspiracy, that the hospitals were empty and that people were not really getting sick. Do you 1. still believe that the pandemic is a liberal conspiracy, or 2. accept that it was and is real and that those right-wing sources pushing that narrative it was not real or not serious were either lying to you or wrong?

                            I'm wondering what the relationship is between a right-wing conspiracy theorist and the right-wing media. Does the media lead you to believe that stuff, or do you believe it before the media says it, and seek out media that confirms it? Do you reject a media source when it does not conform to scientific truths and fact-checked reality, or do you instead reject it when it does not reinforce your own belief system? Does your belief system ever allow that your political opponents might be right about something and your political allies might be wrong about something?
                            You ask me to indulge you then insult me. Great start.

                            Can you provide some links or examples of the wild misinformation that I am being exposed to which is like a disease so I can respond appropriately?

                            what 'echo chamber' are you referring to? If you read this entire thread, you'll see I wrote "I still go into hot topics" even though the insanity bothers me. You know why? because I try to learn what people think and what both sides of an issue are, then making decisions which are good for me.

                            "liberal conspiracy" as you put it is not my type of speak and I certainly did not use those words.

                            Who is 'right wing' media? It certainly isn't cnn or msnbc or wapo or nyt or usatoday, those have all become dem activist. Are you old enough to remember when you could watch or read those listed and learn both sides of an issue?

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by GwynnInTheHall View Post
                              This is fucking hilarious. The "Forensic Audit" is being performed IN SECRET, by a PARTISAN group, a Stop the Steal owned company (Cyber Ninjas) who has NO experience in elections or audits and now has moved the machines, ballots and "audit" out of state to Montana.

                              This AFTER there were already 15 hand counts, the machines examined, tested twice and a real forensic audit conducted by REAL auditors and no voter fraud was found.

                              But hey, you're SERIOUS about people believing any result that come from your chosen Mouth of God Audit.



                              I truly look forward to learning the results of the ONLY maricopa forensic audit of the 2020 election.

                              if they say "biden" won, oh well, let's hope maga does better in 2022.

                              but if the truth is shown to be fraud, what a blight on western culture. how did a great country such as the United States allow socialist to infiltrated so deeply they were able to steal an election?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by GwynnInTheHall View Post
                                This is fucking hilarious. The "Forensic Audit" is being performed IN SECRET, by a PARTISAN group, a Stop the Steal owned company (Cyber Ninjas) who has NO experience in elections or audits and now has moved the machines, ballots and "audit" out of state to Montana.

                                This AFTER there were already 15 hand counts, the machines examined, tested twice and a real forensic audit conducted by REAL auditors and no voter fraud was found.

                                But hey, you're SERIOUS about people believing any result that come from your chosen Mouth of God Audit.


                                You've got to give them one thing though - Cyber Ninjas is a pretty sweet name.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X