Originally posted by eldiablo505
1) It was unfunded.
2) It was funded by a tax increase.
3) There are already similar programs in place addressing this need.
4) It was a typical election season stunt of putting a popular-sounding bill up for a vote knowing there are provisions in it the other side can't possibly vote for in order to embarrass them.
Was there a Pay-Go kind of spending cut included in the bill to cover the cost?
Comment