Originally posted by johnnya24
View Post
Going back over the stories and analysis, I can't find anything to justify those odds ... most polls were saying neck-and-neck, and certain polls were / are saying No was quite far ahead.
PP are notorious for their dubious publicity stunts, but interfering with a delicate political process to steer public opinion in their desired direction is way beyond the mark IMO. I wonder if it's even legal to fix a market like this ... is it even "fixing" ... I dunno.
This has been a curiosity for me since it was announced ... because it did coincide with a shift in momentum between the 2 sides, and there doesn't seem to be any data backing up such short odds, and the early payout on top of that.
Comment