Originally posted by Ken
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
value calculators
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
---------------------------------------------
Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
---------------------------------------------
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, 1984
-
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View PostBecause the entire focus has been how what I am proposing is wrong. Explain to me how the alterntive is better
To be fair, so am I by using conventional valuation.
Which is why I opt to eliminate the middle man and go right to subjective alterations but doing so with an understanding of what conventional valuation is and its limitations - so it's educated alterations.Follow me on Twitter @ToddZola
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ken View PostI literally did exactly that previously with the Spencer Turnbull x 10 example. And you completely ignored it.---------------------------------------------
Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
---------------------------------------------
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, 1984
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View Postyou just accept one approach as good and apply no critical thought to it
I just spent hours of my day analyzing something for YOUR league and you post bullshit like that? Screw you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Todd Zola View PostIn short, you're basing conclusions on an erroneous set of inputs, specifically the inclusion of projected stats not earmarked for the final stat pool at the end of the season.
To be fair, so am I by using conventional valuation.
Which is why I opt to eliminate the middle man and go right to subjective alterations but doing so with an understanding of what conventional valuation is and its limitations - so it's educated alterations.---------------------------------------------
Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
---------------------------------------------
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, 1984
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ken View PostDude, go screw yourself. You are just being an asshole. I'm out.
I just spent hours of my day analyzing something for YOUR league and you post bullshit like that? Screw you.---------------------------------------------
Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
---------------------------------------------
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, 1984
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View Postit actually isn't my league, because my daily league has vastly different settings than this, and my whole involvement wasn't based on trying to get help, but rather to have a discussion about how best to address the situation given the calculators that we have access to. Have a great day.
Even better.
You're the ass here man.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View Postnot at all. you apparently think having an auction calculator that indicates negative value for many players who actually have value and inflates the value of the upper tier of players is more accurate than what I proposed. Because my first rough estimate wasn't exactly accurate. you just accept one approach as good and apply no critical thought to it, while trying to find any small detail that is wrong with what i presented.
But I doubt you even read it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Todd Zola View PostIn short, you're basing conclusions on an erroneous set of inputs, specifically the inclusion of projected stats not earmarked for the final stat pool at the end of the season.
To be fair, so am I by using conventional valuation.
Which is why I opt to eliminate the middle man and go right to subjective alterations but doing so with an understanding of what conventional valuation is and its limitations - so it's educated alterations.---------------------------------------------
Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
---------------------------------------------
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, 1984
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ken View PostIf you would read what I wrote, rather than being busy trying to lob personal attacks, you'd realize that the example I provided showed the extra pitchers netting out because the talent curve is relatively flat at the end. That would mean, by netting out the streamers assuming everyone is streaming, the actual auction value for the others remains the same.
But I doubt you even read it.
EDIT: forgot "you're the ass here man"
EDIT 2: "Dumbass"---------------------------------------------
Champagne for breakfast and a Sherman in my hand !
---------------------------------------------
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.
George Orwell, 1984
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View Postthis is a valid point, but as you noted the approach you are presenting has the same issue. I'm just trying to establish a better process for perhaps making it more accurate. And what I'm proposing is clearly not perfect, but I believe it is more accurate than just using the same inputs for daily and weekly leagues. At this point I regret ever asking the questions I did
Which is it, on one of the early pages I asked for your methodology and you complained that you shouldn't have to provide it because you are asking the question. But now you are complaining that people disagree with you after you actually provided the reasoning.
It's ridiculous man.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View Postyes, I'm the clearly the one lobbing personal attacks like "screw you", "your an asshole", "go screw yourself". yes, I'm clearly the one lobbing personal attacks. Clearly.
EDIT: forgot "you're the ass here man"
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Feral Slasher View Postexactly, neither approach is perfect. So which one provides a more accurate assesment of the value that a set of stats will actually provide ? Alterations absolutely need to be made. which approach provides a better starting point ? If you want to go straight to subjective alterations and not attempt to create a "middle man" that is not unreasonable. I also don't think it is unreasonable to try to use altered calculator inputs (middle man) to try to gain understanding of real value
I do like spaghetti though. Except it's on the "do not eat" list, so zoodles it is...Follow me on Twitter @ToddZola
Comment
Comment