I had a weird situation where week 5 I had several WRs on byes and week 6 I have several RBs on byes. So I worked out a deal with another owner where I trade him Addai for Branch for week 5 (so I get a WR and he gets Addai with a juicy matchup vs KC). Then we had agreed to trade back. Obviously it was just a gentleman's agreement and not binding.
The Addai injury throws a monkeywrench in things, but I figured I'd still rather have Addai long term (It's not even certain that he's out for week 6 yet) so we traded back today. It was promptly vetoed and we were publically scolded by the commissioner.
If the deal makes sense in both directions and we're only trying to improve our own teams did we really do anything wrong?
The Addai injury throws a monkeywrench in things, but I figured I'd still rather have Addai long term (It's not even certain that he's out for week 6 yet) so we traded back today. It was promptly vetoed and we were publically scolded by the commissioner.
If the deal makes sense in both directions and we're only trying to improve our own teams did we really do anything wrong?
Comment