Tweet
On the Draft Screen, anyone know how to change the max salary in the Salary Box? It only goes as high as 59. I had changed it before in the older version, but now I don't see anywhere to do this now.
-
-
It’s in setup. I’m not at home but can be more prescriptive in a bit but you need to change the number of rows (I think that is what it’s called). Easy change so if you don’t figure it out let me know and I can send a screen shot later -
Yeah, I got it.
Setup>Rows in Bid Menu. Then change from 8 to 10 or more.Comment
-
Good stuff. You’ll need those extra rows for Trout, Betts and Ramirez tonight.....
Comment
-
LOL I was thinking the same thingOriginally posted by Big Tymer View PostGood stuff. You’ll need those extra rows for Trout, Betts and Ramirez tonight.....If I whisper my wicked marching orders into the ether with no regard to where or how they may bear fruit, I am blameless should a broken spirit carry those orders out upon the innocent, for it was not my hand that took the action merely my lips which let slip their darkest wish. ~Daniel Devereaux 2011
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
Martin Luther King, Jr.Comment
-
That's exactly why I was asking, lolOriginally posted by Big Tymer View PostGood stuff. You’ll need those extra rows for Trout, Betts and Ramirez tonight.....Comment
-
Yeah, I had this question a couple of years ago - Rick hooked me up then too. Though neither went as high as I thought they would, tbh; Trout only eclipsed 59 by 2, and Mookie was under it by 1."Instead of all of this energy and effort directed at the war to end drugs, how about a little attention to drugs which will end war?" Albert HofmannComment
-
-
$52...Originally posted by harmon View Post"Instead of all of this energy and effort directed at the war to end drugs, how about a little attention to drugs which will end war?" Albert HofmannComment
-
Did they change from industry standards K/9, BB/9 etc to the BBHQ standards K%, BB% this year? It makes editing pitching projections far more difficult, and it doesn't seem as if you can add K/9 back in the settings. As a 15+ year user, I don't ever recall K%. Anyone else feel the same, or am I "misremembering?"
EDIT - I didn't misremember. I sent Merv and email, and yup, he changed it from K9 to K% this year. He said it was "reflective of the industry" and got many requests to change it to K%. I responded that Baseball-Reference and FanGraphs both still use K9 and not K%. Let's hope he at least adds K9 back next season.Comment
-
K% > K/9 -- wish it were the standard in ballpark scoreboards tooComment
-
-
Easiest thing is K% is so much easier to calculate or explain to someone: "K% is the percentage of batters a pitcher strikes out" vs "K/9 is the rate pitchers strike out batters per 9 innings they pitch"Originally posted by harmon View Post
good read: https://www.vivaelbirdos.com/2014/2/...etter-than-k-9 & https://community.fangraphs.com/batt...-k9-kbb-and-k/Comment
-
For SP, k's per start would capture what I want to know. That's a "bottom line" number and reflects stamina and efficiency as well as k power.Originally posted by Moonlight J View Post
A higher K% is not valuable if he needs 100 pitches over 4 innings and gets lifted because he's gassed.Comment
-
Does this mean we should change ERA to ER%? I don't buy the logic that K% is easier to explain than K/9. Baseball fans that care enough at that level can do that math, and they're used to the K/9 stat anyway...Originally posted by Moonlight J View Post"Instead of all of this energy and effort directed at the war to end drugs, how about a little attention to drugs which will end war?" Albert HofmannComment
Comment