So, if Dershowitz's defense of Trump holds and sets precedent--That--"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment" or If the President believes he's the best thing for the country--He can do whatever he likes.
So should that argument win the day and result in acquittal of Trump. Does it set precedent and if so, what's to stop Trump from ignoring any election results that oust him from the Office if he believes--He's the best thing for the country?
He's inferred he'd fight any attempt to oust him as illegitimate even if he loses the election he's promised he won't go quietly.
Should this happen ( and I agree, it's quite a few steps to take logically), how would you react? What would you be prepared to do?
I only say this because very few in the Govt and none of his supporters (a Third of the County) seem like they'd get in his way if that was the course of action he took.
Enjoy my moment.
So should that argument win the day and result in acquittal of Trump. Does it set precedent and if so, what's to stop Trump from ignoring any election results that oust him from the Office if he believes--He's the best thing for the country?
He's inferred he'd fight any attempt to oust him as illegitimate even if he loses the election he's promised he won't go quietly.
Should this happen ( and I agree, it's quite a few steps to take logically), how would you react? What would you be prepared to do?
I only say this because very few in the Govt and none of his supporters (a Third of the County) seem like they'd get in his way if that was the course of action he took.
Enjoy my moment.
Comment