Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

10 unsettling answers to the fermi paradox

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by onejayhawk View Post
    To the contrary, the math says I'm right.

    The math says that if we are not alone then they are already here. Muller and Sculley aside, I don't think they are here, so we must be alone.

    J
    What math says that if there is life elsewhere in the vast, ever expanding universe that they must be here, with us, right now, on earth? Please show your work.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Sour Masher View Post
      What math says that if there is life elsewhere in the vast, ever expanding universe that they must be here, with us, right now, on earth? Please show your work.
      “There’s no normal life, Wyatt, it’s just life. Get on with it.” – Doc Holliday

      "It doesn't matter what you think" - The Rock

      "I borked the entry." - Some dude on the Internet

      Have I told you about otters being the only marine animal that can lift rocks?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Sour Masher View Post
        What math says that if there is life elsewhere in the vast, ever expanding universe that they must be here, with us, right now, on earth? Please show your work.
        made me think of this (seems appropriate ... )

        It certainly feels that way. But I'm distrustful of that feeling and am curious about evidence.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Sour Masher View Post
          What math says that if there is life elsewhere in the vast, ever expanding universe that they must be here, with us, right now, on earth? Please show your work.
          I wont argue right here, right now, on earth. But the math supports elsewhere and concurrent


          With pleasure....it's called the Drake Equation

          N = R* • fp • ne • fl • fi • fc • L

          The Drake Equation is used to estimate the number of communicating civilizations in the cosmos, or more simply put, the odds of finding intelligent life in the universe.


          I'm not going to argue with the math
          "You know what's wrong with America? If I lovingly tongue a woman's nipple in a movie, it gets an "NC-17" rating, if I chop it off with a machete, it's an "R". That's what's wrong with America, man...."--Dennis Hopper

          "One should judge a man mainly from his depravities. Virtues can be faked. Depravities are real." -- Klaus Kinski

          Comment


          • #20
            there's also the rare earth equation too but i've never attempted that one. i think it's harder. i've done the drake equation a few times and i always come out to one technological civilization per galaxy. but i noticed the 2nd time i did it, i felt bias and like i was trying to fudge my answers to come out the same.

            also, the other day i heard them say the milky way hasn't had very many collisions. and actually, i suspected as much! heh

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by nullnor View Post
              there's also the rare earth equation too but i've never attempted that one. i think it's harder. i've done the drake equation a few times and i always come out to one technological civilization per galaxy. but i noticed the 2nd time i did it, i felt bias and like i was trying to fudge my answers to come out the same.

              also, the other day i heard them say the milky way hasn't had very many collisions. and actually, i suspected as much! heh
              The Milky Way is one of how many galaxies? 100 Billion? 200 Billion? This is why the math works.
              "You know what's wrong with America? If I lovingly tongue a woman's nipple in a movie, it gets an "NC-17" rating, if I chop it off with a machete, it's an "R". That's what's wrong with America, man...."--Dennis Hopper

              "One should judge a man mainly from his depravities. Virtues can be faked. Depravities are real." -- Klaus Kinski

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Fresno Bob View Post
                The Milky Way is one of how many galaxies? 100 Billion? 200 Billion? This is why the math works.
                actually i think most galaxies have collisions. i'd have to look it up.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Fresno Bob View Post
                  I wont argue right here, right now, on earth. But the math supports elsewhere and concurrent


                  With pleasure....it's called the Drake Equation

                  N = R* • fp • ne • fl • fi • fc • L

                  The Drake Equation is used to estimate the number of communicating civilizations in the cosmos, or more simply put, the odds of finding intelligent life in the universe.


                  I'm not going to argue with the math
                  The challenge (at least for now) is that astronomers don't have firm numbers on any of those variables, so any calculation of the Drake Equation remains a rough estimate for now.

                  Very hard to argue the math without numbers.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by nullnor View Post
                    actually i think most galaxies have collisions. i'd have to look it up.
                    Well, they are ugly for sure:

                    “There’s no normal life, Wyatt, it’s just life. Get on with it.” – Doc Holliday

                    "It doesn't matter what you think" - The Rock

                    "I borked the entry." - Some dude on the Internet

                    Have I told you about otters being the only marine animal that can lift rocks?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Gregg View Post
                      The challenge (at least for now) is that astronomers don't have firm numbers on any of those variables, so any calculation of the Drake Equation remains a rough estimate for now.

                      Very hard to argue the math without numbers.
                      Must....not.....snark......
                      “There’s no normal life, Wyatt, it’s just life. Get on with it.” – Doc Holliday

                      "It doesn't matter what you think" - The Rock

                      "I borked the entry." - Some dude on the Internet

                      Have I told you about otters being the only marine animal that can lift rocks?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Gregg View Post
                        The challenge (at least for now) is that astronomers don't have firm numbers on any of those variables, so any calculation of the Drake Equation remains a rough estimate for now.

                        Very hard to argue the math without numbers.
                        I'm super uncomfortable with calling this math. It's not that we don't have "firm" numbers for fl, fi, and fc. We don't have any numbers at all. So this is "guessing" or "imagining" or "positing", not math.

                        I don't have any idea whether there are other intelligent civilizations in the universe. To say we have evidence one way or the other is false. It's more fun to imagine there other civilizations than not, of course, so that's what I hope for, but this is all being dressed up as way more scientific than it actually is.
                        "Jesus said to them, 'Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are going into the kingdom of God ahead of you.'"

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Kevin Seitzer View Post
                          I'm super uncomfortable with calling this math. It's not that we don't have "firm" numbers for fl, fi, and fc. We don't have any numbers at all. So this is "guessing" or "imagining" or "positing", not math.

                          I don't have any idea whether there are other intelligent civilizations in the universe. To say we have evidence one way or the other is false. It's more fun to imagine there other civilizations than not, of course, so that's what I hope for, but this is all being dressed up as way more scientific than it actually is.
                          Great post. Well put.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Gregg View Post
                            The challenge (at least for now) is that astronomers don't have firm numbers on any of those variables, so any calculation of the Drake Equation remains a rough estimate for now.

                            Very hard to argue the math without numbers.
                            When you are dealing with numbers like 100 or 200 Billion on the front end, none of the other numbers need to be that big to make a decent probability
                            "You know what's wrong with America? If I lovingly tongue a woman's nipple in a movie, it gets an "NC-17" rating, if I chop it off with a machete, it's an "R". That's what's wrong with America, man...."--Dennis Hopper

                            "One should judge a man mainly from his depravities. Virtues can be faked. Depravities are real." -- Klaus Kinski

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Fresno Bob View Post
                              When you are dealing with numbers like 100 or 200 Billion on the front end, none of the other numbers need to be that big to make a decent probability
                              They need to be bigger than zero. We don't know if they are bigger than zero, other than us. I think it would be theoretically possible for some of the numbers in the equation to be so small that life elsewhere could be suspected to be extremely unlikely. That doesn't seem to be the case. But we literally have no idea how likely it is, and some of the numbers being very, very big doesn't keep some of the other probabilities from being very, very small--smaller even than the big numbers are big.
                              "Jesus said to them, 'Truly I tell you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are going into the kingdom of God ahead of you.'"

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Fresno Bob View Post
                                When you are dealing with numbers like 100 or 200 Billion on the front end, none of the other numbers need to be that big to make a decent probability
                                It's always fun when we bring in subjectivity to a math equation!

                                You are correct that they don't have to be "that big", but if you start out assuming one of the unknown factors required for life is 1 in 1000 but in reality it is 1 in a trillion, it means that your 100 or 200 Billion on the front end doesn't help you much.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X