Page 293 of 587 FirstFirst ... 193243283291292293294295303343393 ... LastLast
Results 2,921 to 2,930 of 5863

Thread: Election 2020

  1. #2921
    Journeyman
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    2,902
    Quote Originally Posted by Teenwolf View Post
    Thanks for the clarification.

    Do you honestly think, based on these polls, that Biden would be more likely than Sanders or Warren to defeat Trump? Biden with under $9 Mil cash on hand, 58% of his donations are from max donors... vs Trump's $150 Mil, and clear ammo to use vs Biden, regarding Hunter's entire corrupt career... you really think these polls outweigh all of his vulnerabilities, not to mention clear mental degradation rendering him unable to complete full sentences... really?
    As we have stated before, the polls aren’t very predictive right now, but they what we have to talk about now. So, assuming the NYT polls are accurate, if Warren were to lose FL, PA, NV, MI and WI as the polls say she would, then Trump will win. The polls currently show Biden winning those states, so he would win. The good news for you is there is plenty of time for the polls to reset. The bad news for you is that as of today, they clearly show who has the best chance to win and it ain’t Warren or Sanders.

    As for personal view or prediction: Warren will lose to Trump. She underachieved in her previous elections and her middle class tax increase free MFA rollout on Friday was delusional. She may be popular in the Twittersphere and with the WaPo editorial board, but her stuff isn’t going to sell with blue collar Democrats. Again, check her results out relative to Markey in past elections.

    Biden will beat Trump. He may not have a lot of cash on hand now, but if he’s the nominee the cash will roll in to beat Trump. He’s affable and his team will do what it can to blunt his gaffs. The Hunter stuff will be water under the bridge by the time the election rolls around.

    Sanders may or may not beat Trump. He does well in Pa and Mi, which are 2 states the Dems need to have to win, but if the Reps can tie him to a massive middle class tax increase, it will be a hard slog for him. There is a lot of socialism stuff you can tie him to butHis honesty (or candor might be a better word) is refreshing especially in comparison to Warren. He would have a shot, but I also think there is close to a 0% chance he will be the nominee. He would need Warren to drop out and endorse him. Every time I see a video like the one you posted this morning of his ‘VP’ , I think that becomes more and more unlikely.
    Just my opinion.

  2. #2922
    Administrator revo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    fuggedabboutit
    Posts
    20,905
    Quote Originally Posted by nots View Post
    As we have stated before, the polls aren’t very predictive right now, but they what we have to talk about now. So, assuming the NYT polls are accurate, if Warren were to lose FL, PA, NV, MI and WI as the polls say she would, then Trump will win. The polls currently show Biden winning those states, so he would win. The good news for you is there is plenty of time for the polls to reset. The bad news for you is that as of today, they clearly show who has the best chance to win and it ain’t Warren or Sanders.

    As for personal view or prediction: Warren will lose to Trump. She underachieved in her previous elections and her middle class tax increase free MFA rollout on Friday was delusional. She may be popular in the Twittersphere and with the WaPo editorial board, but her stuff isn’t going to sell with blue collar Democrats. Again, check her results out relative to Markey in past elections.

    Biden will beat Trump. He may not have a lot of cash on hand now, but if he’s the nominee the cash will roll in to beat Trump. He’s affable and his team will do what it can to blunt his gaffs. The Hunter stuff will be water under the bridge by the time the election rolls around.

    Sanders may or may not beat Trump. He does well in Pa and Mi, which are 2 states the Dems need to have to win, but if the Reps can tie him to a massive middle class tax increase, it will be a hard slog for him. There is a lot of socialism stuff you can tie him to butHis honesty (or candor might be a better word) is refreshing especially in comparison to Warren. He would have a shot, but I also think there is close to a 0% chance he will be the nominee. He would need Warren to drop out and endorse him. Every time I see a video like the one you posted this morning of his ‘VP’ , I think that becomes more and more unlikely.
    Just my opinion.
    Absolutely. TW needs to remember that there's one clear GOPer vs. 20 Dems. Once the field gets winnowed down to one Dem, the $$ will be rolling in.

  3. #2923
    All Star Sour Masher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    7,212
    Quote Originally Posted by Teenwolf View Post
    Public policy polling recently showed 6% of voters wouldn't vote for a Jew, but I didn't see where women were at. I know both were much lower than LGBTQ2+.

    Buttigieg has no shot, as black voters are allergic to him. Can you imagine if the tapes from Buttigieg's police department came out during a general election? Officers calling the police chief the n-word, the police chief in question who Buttigieg fired. He's toxic to black voters for a reason.
    Buttigieg is smart and articulate enough to successfully explain, as he has, why he had to fire the police chief, and why at the same time, any such tapes emerging would reflect values his is diametrically opposed to. Certainly, this stuff plays into how poorly he is doing among black voters, but based on my experiences, I wonder how much homophobia plays into it as well. The black community, on the whole, has been less supportive of things like gay marriage, but I have not seen a recent breakdown of their support for electing a gay president.

    Still, any time I get worried about such things, I remember what Obama was able to do. The right person with the right message at the right time can overcome biases. I don't know if a 37 year old with no national political experience has what it takes right now, but I do think he'd destroy Trump in debates.

  4. #2924
    Journeyman nullnor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,616
    The right person with the right message at the right time can overcome biases.
    nope. if people are trying to win over trump voters, your wasting your time. or any voter for that matter.

  5. #2925
    All Star Ken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    6,611
    Quote Originally Posted by nullnor View Post
    nope. if people are trying to win over trump voters, your wasting your time. or any voter for that matter.
    ... huh?

  6. #2926
    Journeyman Teenwolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Thunder Bay, ON, CAN
    Posts
    2,851
    Quote Originally Posted by Sour Masher View Post
    Buttigieg is smart and articulate enough to successfully explain, as he has, why he had to fire the police chief, and why at the same time, any such tapes emerging would reflect values his is diametrically opposed to. Certainly, this stuff plays into how poorly he is doing among black voters, but based on my experiences, I wonder how much homophobia plays into it as well. The black community, on the whole, has been less supportive of things like gay marriage, but I have not seen a recent breakdown of their support for electing a gay president.

    Still, any time I get worried about such things, I remember what Obama was able to do. The right person with the right message at the right time can overcome biases. I don't know if a 37 year old with no national political experience has what it takes right now, but I do think he'd destroy Trump in debates.
    Okay, put aside Buttigieg's inability to appeal to black voters. One of the recent national polls asked "Would you like the country to continue on the path set out by Barack Obama or would you prefer more substantial systemic change?" or something like this, and the vote total showed something like 63/37 split supporting greater change. So I think there's less appetite for a return to normalcy than most pundits or observers think there is.

    You don't think his massive shift on Medicare for All is a major red flag for voters who have paid attention? He was on Morning Joe in February defending Medicare for All, then when he thinks it's politically convenient, he shifts to attacking Warren on it, and defending a public option. From everything I've heard, the public option would not work. But the major shift shows that he's completely disingenuous, and honesty is a super important metric to voters. I've heard Buttigieg's recent small bump has been at the expense of Warren, which makes sense as they both have the wealthiest and highest educated bases, whereas Bernie and Biden have more working class voters. So really, if Buttigieg does rise at all, it might continue to cut into Warren's slim advantage over Bernie. I'm optimistic that Bernie has a shot to win over enough Biden voters, depress enough current Biden voters, as well as turn out more unlikely voters to break the polling across the board and pull out a win. One of those recent polls from Michigan showed Bernie with 74% of voters age 18-29. If he can turn out significantly more young voters in 2020, as young voters turned out at higher rates in the midterms than the smaller increase in older demographic turnout, then he has a good chance to upset polling. Especially since polling rarely properly samples younger voters.

    Recent polling showing consistently Biden 26-29, Warren 21-24, Bernie 19, and that all looks good to me for this point in the race. Bernie's recent surge is probably fueled by the AOC, Tlaib, and Omar endorsements. Hopefully the momentum continues.

  7. #2927
    Journeyman nullnor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    2,616
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken View Post
    ... huh?
    I mean in general. politics just seems like a huge waste of time.

  8. #2928
    All Star Ken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    6,611
    Quote Originally Posted by nullnor View Post
    I mean in general. politics just seems like a huge waste of time.
    True.

  9. #2929
    All Star Sour Masher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Binghamton, NY
    Posts
    7,212
    Quote Originally Posted by Teenwolf View Post
    Okay, put aside Buttigieg's inability to appeal to black voters. One of the recent national polls asked "Would you like the country to continue on the path set out by Barack Obama or would you prefer more substantial systemic change?" or something like this, and the vote total showed something like 63/37 split supporting greater change. So I think there's less appetite for a return to normalcy than most pundits or observers think there is.

    You don't think his massive shift on Medicare for All is a major red flag for voters who have paid attention? He was on Morning Joe in February defending Medicare for All, then when he thinks it's politically convenient, he shifts to attacking Warren on it, and defending a public option. From everything I've heard, the public option would not work. But the major shift shows that he's completely disingenuous, and honesty is a super important metric to voters. I've heard Buttigieg's recent small bump has been at the expense of Warren, which makes sense as they both have the wealthiest and highest educated bases, whereas Bernie and Biden have more working class voters. So really, if Buttigieg does rise at all, it might continue to cut into Warren's slim advantage over Bernie. I'm optimistic that Bernie has a shot to win over enough Biden voters, depress enough current Biden voters, as well as turn out more unlikely voters to break the polling across the board and pull out a win. One of those recent polls from Michigan showed Bernie with 74% of voters age 18-29. If he can turn out significantly more young voters in 2020, as young voters turned out at higher rates in the midterms than the smaller increase in older demographic turnout, then he has a good chance to upset polling. Especially since polling rarely properly samples younger voters.

    Recent polling showing consistently Biden 26-29, Warren 21-24, Bernie 19, and that all looks good to me for this point in the race. Bernie's recent surge is probably fueled by the AOC, Tlaib, and Omar endorsements. Hopefully the momentum continues.
    Interesting take. My assumption is Buttigieg's rise would be to replace Biden as the more moderate candidate, but you are suggesting it would be at Warren's expense. Maybe it would be both. I just don't see the country being uniformally left enough to where there isn't significant support during the primaries for at least one candidate to the right of Sanders and Warren.

  10. #2930
    Administrator revo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    fuggedabboutit
    Posts
    20,905
    Just a day after the NY Times/Siena poll showed some concerning news for the good guys, we have this poll from the ABC News/Wash Post that shows Trump getting absolutely battered by all comers:

    Code:
    General Election: Trump vs. Biden	ABC News/Wash Post	Biden 56, Trump 39	Biden +17
    General Election: Trump vs. Warren	ABC News/Wash Post	Warren 55, Trump 40	Warren +15
    General Election: Trump vs. Sanders	ABC News/Wash Post	Sanders 55, Trump 41	Sanders +14
    General Election: Trump vs. Buttigieg	ABC News/Wash Post	Buttigieg 52, Trump 41	Buttigieg +11
    General Election: Trump vs. Harris	ABC News/Wash Post	Harris 51, Trump 42	Harris +9

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •